Skip to content
Výnosometr

Updated 30/09/2026

Buy-to-let flat or an ETF? A comparison on real numbers

Which earns more: a mortgaged flat, or the same money in an ETF? Return, risk, effort, liquidity and taxes in Czechia in 2026, with calculations for a flat in Brno and in Prague.

Anyone with a million or two crowns in the bank usually ends up choosing between a buy-to-let flat and index funds (ETFs). You can borrow to buy a flat; an ETF is simpler and more liquid. Which of them earns more can be calculated, but the answer depends heavily on how flat prices develop.

How we calculate the comparison

A fair comparison has to put exactly the same money into the ETF at the same moments as into the flat: the own funds and purchase costs at the start, and then every monthly top-up by which the rent falls short of the mortgage payment and costs. At the end we compare net wealth: for the flat, the sale price after costs and tax minus the remaining mortgage; for the ETF, the value of the portfolio. This is also how Výnosometr calculates the "Wealth: flat vs. ETF" chart.

For the ETF we assume a return of 6 % a year. The MSCI World global equity index returned an average of 6.5 % a year in 1969-2023 (geometric average), with large swings from year to year.

Results for two flats

Both flats: 20 % own funds, a 30-year mortgage at 5.2 %, a sale after 10 years and rent at the city average. The Brno flat is 55 m² for 5.5 million CZK, the Prague flat 50 m² for 8.5 million CZK.

Annual flat price growthBrno: flat vs. ETFPrague: flat vs. ETF
4 % (default assumption)flat ahead by 1.37 million CZKflat ahead by 0.80 million CZK
2 % (inflation only)roughly evenETF ahead by 1.35 million CZK
0 % (prices stay flat)ETF ahead by 1.19 million CZKETF ahead by 3.15 million CZK

The flat wins if prices grow at least a little faster than inflation. The Prague flat, with low rent relative to its price (a gross yield of 3.3 %), depends on price growth far more than the Brno one (4.7 %). At 2 % growth, the Prague flat would already trail the ETF by more than a million crowns.

What the numbers do not capture

Buy-to-let flatETF
Leverageyes, a mortgage of up to 70-80 % of the priceusually not
Diversificationone flat, one city, one tenantthousands of companies around the world
Liquiditya sale takes months and costs 3-5 % of the priceyou can sell in a few minutes
Efforttenants, repairs, tax returnalmost none
Volatilityprices are not marked to market daily, so you do not see the swingsdrops of 30-50 % are common
Tax on saleexempt after 10 years (flats acquired from 2021)exempt after 3 years, or on sales up to 100,000 CZK a year
Ongoing taxon rental income, often zero in the first years thanks to interest and depreciationnone on accumulating ETFs

When a flat makes sense and when an ETF does

  • Flat: when you buy below market price, the rent is above average relative to the price (a gross yield above 5 %), you have a reserve for the top-ups and the daily ups and downs of shares bother you more than dealing with tenants.
  • ETF: when you want to invest smaller amounts regularly, need access to your money at any time, do not want to deal with tenants, or the flat would depend mainly on rising prices.
  • A combination: many investors hold both. The flat provides leverage and rental income, the ETF spreads risk and provides liquidity.

The calculator runs the comparison for a specific flat: set the "Alternative investment return" field to the return you expect from an ETF, and the "What if…" table shows how the result changes with slower price growth.

Sources

This text is indicative and does not replace tax, legal or financial advice. For binding decisions consult a Czech tax adviser. · Privacy policy · Terms of use ·